Abstract & Summary

Table of Contents
ROP description
Eugenics against oxygen
Slandering oxygen
Oxygen study frauds  
Alleged study results
Later deaths
Futility and harm
Fluorescent ROP lamps
Damaging irradiance
Preemie vulnerabilities
Studies of light and ROP
Frauds in LIGHT-ROP
Coverup stonewalling


Related items

Protect your baby

Baby-blinding lights
Macular degeneration
Preemie Pain
Parent Concerns

 Skeptics' Test

 Help for Victims?


Bioethics LIGHT-ROP

Bioethics SUPPORT

Bioethics own violations

Bioethics Consent

Bioethics 1955 Oxygen

Unethical Bioethics 1

Unethical Bioethics 2

Unethical Bioethics 3

Unethical Bioethics 4

Hypocritical Nature
False Medical Denials

Pre-Nuremberg Bioethics

AVAAZ petition to WHO >>>

TV transcripts
on baby-blinding

Good Morning America
CBC Market Place
USA Today


Print coverage
The New York Times
Parade Magazine

About us










AVAAZ petition to WHO
Peter Aleff,   June 12, 2013     




Petition posted at

What change do you want?
Stop preemie blinding and suffocating experiments

Who can make this happen?

Dr. Margaret Chan,
Director-General, World Health Organization

Avenue Appia 20
1211 Geneva 27

Why is the petition important?

Baby-blinding retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of childhood blindness in much of the world. Yet, the medical approach to this ongoing epidemic has been misled by blatant research frauds and compromised by gross ethics violations that killed and maimed many premature babies like disposable guinea pigs without addressing the problem.

Moreover, the U.S. health officials in charge routinely denied the ethics violations and misrepresented the facts to cover up the research crimes, as some top leaders at the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) are doing right now to defend the lack of parental consent and to deny the premeditated killings in the recent lethal SUPPORT experiment of restricting oxygen breathing help for premature babies. See
for documentation.

The doctrine of withholding supplementary oxygen from preemies to stop ROP was introduced in 1955. It was hailed as a great success because it quickly ended the blinding, but it did so only by intentionally killing off the preemies most likely to suffer the eye damage. The influential U.S. doctors responsible for this throttling of the life-saving gas had blamed "defective germ plasm" for the blinding and advised to not be so "zealous in preserving these defective persons". Their crypto-eugenicist program to eliminate the blinding by restricting the needed breathing help became instant unverified dogma for intensive care nurseries around the world. In its first two decades, it killed in the U.S. alone at least 150,000 of the most vulnerable babies because the prestigious researchers had falsely claimed that this systematic asphyxiation program did not affect the preemies' mortality, and no one questioned their knowingly false assertion.

Similarly, the designers of the1990s LIGHT-ROP experiment in the U.S. rigged their protocol to falsely assert the innocence of the bright fluorescent nursery lighting, despite a mountain of solid evidence that its excessive brightness in the most retina-damaging wavelength was and still is the primary cause of the continued baby-blinding. Oxygen had been given to preemies routinely for many decades when the ROP epidemic started in the U.S. in 1940, the first year after the introduction of fluorescent lamps. The same sequence happened again after World War Two in many other industrial countries as soon as these lamps became available there. The typical intensive care nursery lighting exposes the unprotected retinae of a preemie in just a few minutes to the dose of damage-weighted blue-light-hazard which the U.S. Occupational Guidelines have set as the cumulative danger limit for adult industrial workers in an eight-hour shift.

For a detailed documentation of these two major research frauds, see and the pages grouped with it in the navigation bar at left, particularly about the still unacknowledged reason for this systematic medical mass killing.

The above SUPPORT experiment is the latest example of unethical preemie-harming ROP research. It is one of the parallel NeOProM oxygen-restricting experiments in which deceptive medical researchers did not inform the parents about the risks but predictably killed many "extra" preemies in the low-oxygen groups and are likely to leave many others with permanent severe brain damage.

The umbrella proposal for this NeOProM research is posted at The individual experiments conducted under it were BOOST II Australia and UK, BOOST NZ, COT in Canada, Argentina, Finland, Germany, Israel, and the U.S., and SUPPORT in the U.S.. Their common design had many flaws, including the serious ethics violation that they deliberately exposed the babies in the low-oxygen groups to an increased risk of death and severe brain damage and had therefore to be conducted behind the backs of the parents.

The researchers knew that they could not obtain those parents' informed consent if they explained the relative risks in the two groups of their experiment, but they also knew they had nothing to fear for breaking this rule, at least in the U.S.. When the media learned of this violation, the experimenters and their "bioethicist" colleagues simply circled their wagons and denied all wrongdoing. Even the  Director of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) and two of his top executives there joined the chorus of Nuremberg-Code-scorners to deny the need for consent and to cover up the SUPPORT researchers' crime of deliberately asphyxiating 23 human babies for "science". 

Peter Aleff is a retired engineer and factory manager, and an active researcher. One of his sons was born prematurely and remains blind and brain-damaged from that ordeal.


We signers of this petition urge you to

  • make the end of ROP an inexpensive but effective part of your Organization's current Action Plan for the prevention of avoidable blindness:
  • have independent non-medical experts verify the evidence for the role of the fluorescent nursery lamps in the baby- blinding presented at
    Babyblindinglights01.htm, then launch an information campaign to replace these with a safer illumination that is  more suitable for the eyes of preemies meant to have developed in a dark womb;
  • end the harmful oxygen restrictions imposed by a doctrine based on a research fraud that falsely blamed this life-saving gas for ROP;
  • convey to the health officials in the countries where the  recent preemie-suffocating NeOProM experiments were conducted that such gross ethics violations will no longer be condoned, and that it is time to start taking the declarations of medical ethics seriously.


Return to navigation bar    Back to top     About us
Our Privacy Policy     Useful Links    

Contact us at
2097 Cottonwood Drive, Vineland, NJ 08361  USA
All not otherwise credited material on this site is
1986 to 2014 H. Peter Aleff All rights reserved.
This site was last updated on January 3, 2015